Acoals
Senior Member
I think we're getting way off topic.......
The topic of this thread is "interesting".
Pretty hard to get off topic there . . .
I think we're getting way off topic.......
Once again, free speech, and more importantly the fact that the government has NO RIGHT OR POWER to infringe on my right to say what I want, trumps any single case of a wrong being committed.Not every employer takes references with a grain of salt. The privacy act protects the employer too. If the employer were to blurt out confidential info. on a former employee could get them in a lot of trouble. There was case years ago where an ex of an employee was stalking him. They called his former employer who blurted out where he went to work. Some employers would give negative reviews in an attempt to keep the person from getting a job. A reference letter or a signed release is more likely to get a positive reference. Just being able to call up any former employee could open a can of worms. There are many circumstances a former employer could give a negative reference that isn't deserved. In Vetech's case with such poor maintenance on machines, what if an employee was told to keep running a machine that clearly had an issue and the machine had a catastrophic failure. The foreman or boss reams the employee out blaming them for the failure. The employee quits over it and applies elsewhere. The new potential employer calls the former employer and they're still blaming the employee for something that wasn't his fault and give the most negative reference they can. Does the employ deserve to not get hired because of it? It's easy to say it's a stupid law if you've never been denied a job because of an employer with a grudge. Can't give a reference is 1 thing. Saying everything possible to prevent a former employee from getting another job is another thing.
I don't think it's illegal to give a bad reference (at least here) it's just asking for trouble. We typically just go with the worked these dates, made this amount of money and is or is not available for re-hire.
Once again, free speech, and more importantly the fact that the government has NO RIGHT OR POWER to infringe on my right to say what I want, trumps any single case of a wrong being committed.
"Small minds discuss people. Average minds discuss events. Great minds discuss ideas."
Stop focusing on small minds and see the greater good!
And must be proved in a court of law as false statements to qualify.
What if an employer told a prospective employer a former worker was a drunk just to make it almost impossible for that employee to get another job and there was no basis at all for it? Reminds me of the National Enquirer getting sued big time for saying Carol Burnett was drunk. She doesn't drink. Free speech doesn't trump false statements.Once again, free speech, and more importantly the fact that the government has NO RIGHT OR POWER to infringe on my right to say what I want, trumps any single case of a wrong being committed.
"Small minds discuss people. Average minds discuss events. Great minds discuss ideas."
Stop focusing on small minds and see the greater good!
Dave,No need to elaborate any more than that. The employee is no longer with you so why do you care where they go.
If one guy rode his tricycle tire over someone else's toe, no child should ever be able to ride a tricycle again...What if an employer told a prospective employer a former worker was a drunk just to make it almost impossible for that employee to get another job and there was no basis at all for it? Reminds me of the National Enquirer getting sued big time for saying Carol Burnett was drunk. She doesn't drink. Free speech doesn't trump false statements
P.S.
Sorry CM, I tried to stay out.