Comparing the numbers:
4TNE88 is 133.6 cubic inches and makes 46.3 HP (or 0.34656 HP per cubic inch)
4TNE84 is 121.7 cubic inches and makes 42.8 HP (or 0.35168 HP per cubic inch)
TK486V is 128 cubic inches and makes 33.9 HP (or 0.26484 HP per cubic inch)
4TNE88 turbo is 133.6 cubic inches and makes 60 HP (or 0.44910 HP per cubic inch)
Presumably the fuel injection on the TK486V could be modified/adjusted to make similar power-per-cubic-inch as the 4TNE88 non-turbo engine, which would increase the TK486V numbers to 44.4 horsepower at a comparable 2600 rpm. Turbocharged (0.49910 HP per cubic inch) the TK486V should be able to make 57.5 horsepower. Again, this is extrapolating the John Deere numbers against the Thermoking. I don't know if there's a substantial difference in camshaft profile between the Thermoking and the John Deere engines. Does Yanmar offer a selection of camshaft profiles? I have no idea?
Hey Entropy, This is great info and I really appreciate you taking the time to share all of this with me. I searched and searched and have not found any info even close to this. (Obviously I don't know the correct places to look)!
If I am following you correctly The 4TNE88 with turbo makes 60HP.
My JD 1600 WAM came with the smaller 4TNE84 with turbo.
I replaced it with the TK486 with a turbo.
I have turned up the injector pump 1-1/2 turns (this brought it to very light smoke so I figure that to be the max that I can/should adjust it).
Plus I used the exhaust man including the turbo from my original 4TNE84.
Hopefully this means that I have increased the HP to 57.5 (or something similar).
So if I am getting close to 57HP and the 4TNE88 turbo (which again is bigger than my original 4TNE84 turbo) has 60HP, then I should be in good shape.
I hope this is actually close to what I have.
Entropy does this sound like I am following your numbers correctly?
I guess the thing that made me feel that the TK486 did not have enough power is when I cranked it (on the test stand) I expected it to roar to life and sound similar to the 4 cylinder Kubota that is in my Bobcat. Although the TK486 runs as smooth as could be it did not sound like the power house my Kubota sounds like. And then with what little info I could find I was looking at the TK486 rating of 33.9 HP @ 2200 rpm to the 60 HP that the John Deere book says the 1600 WAM mower has.
Entropy,
With all of the numbers and info that you have given above it has given me hope that I am in the ballpark (HP wise) and that this engine swap might actually work after all!!!!!!!!!!
Hopefully today I will crank this machine (for the first with the engine installed and not only on the test stand) and actually drive it out of my shop where it has been for 2 years while played with it on and off. THAT WILL BE A GREAT FEELING IF IT HAPPENS!!!!!!
Thanks All,
For the time and info that you have shared over the last couple of years on this thread.
Josh,
Good luck to you on the engine swap. I look forward to seeing how your story turns out.