• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

GM Diesel, interesting how times change...

Brodiesel

Senior Member
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
259
Location
Winnemucca, NV
Occupation
My wife makes all the $$$.
Got hired by Union Pacific out of Roseville but in the meantime been working for a company in Stockton building Detroit 2-Strokes. So interesting how times change, I'm working with one other mechanic 69 years old and he's been at it since the 70's but he can't last much longer. Such beautiful engines in my opinion, the 53, 71, and 92...just sayin...strange to be working on these engines in CALIFORNIA where they have become practically obsolete.
IMG_1499.JPG IMG_1509.jpg IMG_1560.JPG
 

rwoody

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2017
Messages
51
Location
Pleasanton TX
Occupation
Heavy Repair/Sales/Military Surplus
thats awesome good old engines but ............EPA has hurt the poor man running them!
 

Bumpsteer

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2009
Messages
1,351
Location
Front seat on the Struggle Bus
Occupation
Mechanical designer
One has to give credit to the designers & engineers that created such a versitale platform.
There has ever been (or will be) a commonized engine design that has powered the machinery that a 2 stroke Detroit has. Just keep adding cylinders, ok, make it a "V", keep adding cylinders, more power?, make 'em bigger cylinders.

Ed
 

Brodiesel

Senior Member
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
259
Location
Winnemucca, NV
Occupation
My wife makes all the $$$.
In my own excitement I forgot that there was already a good thread goin on these engines, and I had already commented on it. !!Duh.
 

ol'stonebreaker

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Messages
333
Location
Idaho
Occupation
retired
I liken them to the small block Chevy. 52 years old and still the same basic block design. Detroit and SBC prove the old adage: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".
Mike
 

Former Wrench

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
475
Location
Montesano, WA
Occupation
Retired
Back in the 70"s I worked for a Detroit Diesel distributor. Once in awhile old 2 valve 6-71's would come in for rebuilding that had the word "Battle" stamped in the throttle. I was told these came out of WWII landing crafts and that setting allowed more fuel so the boat could ram the beach at a higher rate of speed and get the troops in closer.
 

Junkyard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
3,650
Location
Claremore, OK
Occupation
Field Mechanic
Back in the 70"s I worked for a Detroit Diesel distributor. Once in awhile old 2 valve 6-71's would come in for rebuilding that had the word "Battle" stamped in the throttle. I was told these came out of WWII landing crafts and that setting allowed more fuel so the boat could ram the beach at a higher rate of speed and get the troops in closer.

Now that would be cool. I'm fascinated with them, have been since the first runaway I heard about 20 years ago when I worked for the crane company. Never heard anything like them up to that point. Not too many engines capable of powering everything you own and have so many common parts. In the bush they'd be ideal IMO.
 

Birken Vogt

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
5,345
Location
Grass Valley, Ca
Back in the 70"s I worked for a Detroit Diesel distributor. Once in awhile old 2 valve 6-71's would come in for rebuilding that had the word "Battle" stamped in the throttle. I was told these came out of WWII landing crafts and that setting allowed more fuel so the boat could ram the beach at a higher rate of speed and get the troops in closer.

That doesn't quite add up...if the injector racks go to full travel in the course of normal operation how could they add more fuel in battle condition? Did they have some kind of rack stop so they did not go quite full unless in battle mode? Or was battle mode perhaps higher RPM in the governor instead?
 

StanRUS

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2016
Messages
767
Location
Cal
That doesn't quite add up...if the injector racks go to full travel in the course of normal operation how could they add more fuel in battle condition? Did they have some kind of rack stop so they did not go quite full unless in battle mode? Or was battle mode perhaps higher RPM in the governor instead?
Good ?, guessing increased RPM.

@Junkyard fast forward to 4:07
 

Junkyard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
3,650
Location
Claremore, OK
Occupation
Field Mechanic
Oh hell yeah. Buzzin dozen baby! For those who understand no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible!
 

Birken Vogt

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
5,345
Location
Grass Valley, Ca
I found that article and one other the only references to the "battle governor". 165 HP normal/225 HP battle. That is quite a jump. Neither article seems to mention how it was accomplished.
 

Brodiesel

Senior Member
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
259
Location
Winnemucca, NV
Occupation
My wife makes all the $$$.
Yeah that article is great. Exactly what Im talking about how the Detroits go way back and are connected to to the Designs of Charles Kettering and Wintons 201A locomotive engines. Super cool.
 

lantraxco

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
7,704
Location
Elsewhen
I've never believed it, but was told by more than one "old guy" (of which now apparently I am one) that some of the old Greyhound GM buses had an override in high gear that pushed the governed rpm way up. One old guy I worked for claimed a bus passed him late at night doing in excess of 90 mph, as he was rolling well past 80 in his big Mercury sedan back in the sixties. Could be true, the detroits would probably hang together running under constant load at higher than normal governed rpm though I am sure it would shorten the lifespan.
 
Top