• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

953d

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,549
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
The 963D specalog is now on the Cat page if you're interested in a gander...

Looked at it today- thanks for the info. I think the next track loader will be a 963D. It's big enough to load 25ton artics yet still has the fine grade capabilities of the smaller loaders.:)
 

Tigerotor77W

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
1,014
Location
Michigan
Occupation
Engineer
Looked at it today- thanks for the info. I think the next track loader will be a 963D. It's big enough to load 25ton artics yet still has the fine grade capabilities of the smaller loaders.:)

Sure. The thing that surprises me is that the static tipping load actually decreased from the 963C to the 963D, which doesn't make much sense because the machine got around a ton heavier. I'll have to double-check that spec sometime.
 

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,549
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
Hey guys:notworthy ,does anyone have download the brochure of the cat 963d???My computer can`t download it by the cat website.

I had a problem with it too. You may have to try several times to get it to download. It took me 3 times before I got it.
 

Tigerotor77W

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
1,014
Location
Michigan
Occupation
Engineer
When downloading the Cat literature from the site, you have to right-click and "Save As." When you save it, rename it as [whateveryouwant].pdf -- for instance, when you right-click on the 963D and choose "Save As," call the file "963D.pdf"

That should work.
 

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,549
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
I got very lucky today! I had the opportunity to run a 953D today for about an hour. Can't reveal the sources but I did have permission to run it.:)

Here's what I can say about the machine:
1. First of all it is extremely quiet. With the throttle turned up to operating speed you can carry on a phone conversation.

2. The controls are very responsive and the steering is so responsive it is touchy but with time in the seat it won't be a problem.

3. Visability is greatly improved especially to the rear. You can see the rear track from the seat.

4. It's got plenty of power but I am not sure that it is any stronger than a C model. I would like to get them side by side for a demo.

5. The V-steer and bucket controls are mounted to the seat and slide with the seat. The seat slides side to side, like the C loaders if you want it to, but the weird thing is with the controls mounted to the seat they slide with you. That took a little getting use to. This machine had 1026 hours on it and the V-steer console was loose and had about a 1/2" play side to side. The bucket control console was tight.

6. The radiator and fan are much improved from a maintenance standpoint. Look at the pictures and you can see the hydraulic fan swings out so you can clean the radiator. This machine also had the reverse fan option.
 

Attachments

  • DSC02177 (Small).JPG
    DSC02177 (Small).JPG
    52.4 KB · Views: 1,918
  • DSC02176 (Small).JPG
    DSC02176 (Small).JPG
    60.3 KB · Views: 1,987
  • DSC02174 (Small).JPG
    DSC02174 (Small).JPG
    48.3 KB · Views: 1,898

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,549
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
And a few more.
 

Attachments

  • DSC02173 (Small).JPG
    DSC02173 (Small).JPG
    66.8 KB · Views: 1,898
  • DSC02171 (Small).JPG
    DSC02171 (Small).JPG
    59.3 KB · Views: 1,828
  • DSC02172 (Small).JPG
    DSC02172 (Small).JPG
    50.8 KB · Views: 1,867

Tigerotor77W

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
1,014
Location
Michigan
Occupation
Engineer
I've seen some preliminary data that indicates the 953D and 963D outwork the C-series models by a little bit... CM, if you do get ahold of good test data, will you let us know which way the performance leans?
 

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,549
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
So has anyone else had the chance to operate the 953D yet? Any info would be appreciated.
 

Gavin Phillips

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
90
Location
Newcastle, England UK
Occupation
office worker
and I'm stilling trying to determine just what was the largest one ever made.
-Josh

That'd be the Komatsu D155S, weighs around 46 metric tons and usually mounted with a 6 yard rock bucket. As you'd expect not many were built! Komatsu had a line of what they called "dozer shovels" until the early 1990's when they got rid of them. I saw a few D31S and D41S machines here and there but the D41S is only about Cat 943-size so its not exactly one of the larger machines! :rolleyes:

Not many track loaders around here now, most jobs can be done just the same with a competant excavator operator including landscaping. Small demolition sites can be done entirely this way, everything from the demolition, to site clean-up and landscaping afterwards - no need for another machine on the site. Its a shame really, I miss seeing them around!

I'd love to see an HT-4 in the flesh though.

Oh and another name they go by is "traxcavator"; Caterpillar bought out an attachment-building company called Trackson in the early 1930's. They were better known for building pipe-laying side booms and cable-powered loaders. Cat got hold of these loaders and you ended up with the T2 (D2 mounted), T4 (D4 mounted), T6 (D6 mounted) and the mighty T7 (early versions were mounted on the D7 tractor, but later machines were on the D8). The HT4 was a hydraulic loader attachment based on the D4 though.
 

LDK

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
219
Location
UK
That'd be the Komatsu D155S, weighs around 46 metric tons and usually mounted with a 6 yard rock bucket. As you'd expect not many were built!

Hi, wouldn't the CAT 983 have been around that size? I worked on a site that had one and if I remember correctly it had the same engine in it as the D8H? That was around 35 years ago!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Gavin Phillips

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
90
Location
Newcastle, England UK
Occupation
office worker
The Cat 983 had a standard 5 yard bucket and is about 10tons lighter, still a very impressive machine! There was a 983B also, slightly heavier but I have no more information on that machine. It seemed to vanish off the production lines around 1982; excavators were making serious inroads in to job sites where crawler shovels would have been found in abundance.

Komatsu used to be quite a large-scale producer of their "dozer shovels". I wonder if in the future, they might reinstate production?
 

Sparffo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
223
Location
Finland
Occupation
Demolition contractor
Komatsu used to be quite a large-scale producer of their "dozer shovels". I wonder if in the future, they might reinstate production?

hi Gavin!
Nice to see you here also! :)
I have been looking at a komatsu D41s-3 loader in Ireland, i is quite cheap so therefore it is in interest! 4-1 bucket and 80% uc, for only 7000€!
wonder if you get parts for komatsu trackloaders anymore...
 

Gavin Phillips

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
90
Location
Newcastle, England UK
Occupation
office worker
Hi Sparffo

Thanks for the welcome :)

How do you know the machine is a D41S-3 model? The last time I saw a D41S, there was no indication of whether it was a -2 or -3 or whatever. I'm just curious about that. :confused:

I spoke to a guy on the phone at Marubeni-Komatsu once up here in the north-east of England concerning the D41S which I had seen - ironically it wasn't that far from the place I phoned. The guy who I talked to didn't seem to realise I was talking about a track loader and sent me a spec brochure for a D41E-6 dozer instead...:beatsme oh well the brochure was well received anyway! :drinkup

As I recall, D41S is round-about Cat 941/943 size although the Cat's do have a bit more power. Of course Cat did away with the 943 model...
 

Tri-Star

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Messages
74
Location
TN
Sparffo, yes you can still get parts for the 41S. I have a 86 model, and most parts are stocked, But specialty parts, such as cylinders are a different story. Good luck!!!!
 
Top